Finnegan

Finnegan v. Frazier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20213:21-cv-00816California1,746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Sean Matthew Finnegan, Case No.: 21-cv-816-GPC-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO Jeffery Frazier,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendant. [Dkt. No. 2]; AND

16 (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM AND

FOR SEEKING DAMAGES

AGAINST AN IMMUNE

DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO

20 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B) 21 I. INTRODUCTION On April 26, 2021, Plaintiff Sean Matthew Finnegan (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant Jeffery Frazier (“Defendant”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that false statements were made when the Defendant, a judge in Fulton County, Georgia, dismissed Plaintiff’s case for failure to appear. (Dkt. No. 2.) Plaintiff concurrently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Id.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.