Rushdan

Rushdan v. Eshelman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20213:21-cv-01000California1,487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SALADIN RUSHDAN, aka Woods, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01000-DMS-BLM

CDCR #B-38326

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 12 vs. 1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

L. ESHELMAN, [ECF No. 2]

15 Defendant. AND

17 (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

19 REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 20 Plaintiff, Saladin Rushdan, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California, has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) together with a prison certificate completed by an RJD accounting official and a copy of his inmate trust account statement. ECF Nos. 2-3. / / / / / / / / / I. Motion to Proceed IFP A. Standard of Review …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.