Rushdan
Rushdan v. Eshelman
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20213:21-cv-01000California1,487 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SALADIN RUSHDAN, aka Woods, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01000-DMS-BLM
CDCR #B-38326
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 12 vs. 1) DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
L. ESHELMAN, [ECF No. 2]
15 Defendant. AND
17 (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE
19 REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 20 Plaintiff, Saladin Rushdan, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California, has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) together with a prison certificate completed by an RJD accounting official and a copy of his inmate trust account statement. ECF Nos. 2-3. / / / / / / / / / I. Motion to Proceed IFP A. Standard of Review …