Kirschner
Kirschner v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARC S. KIRSCHNER, Case No.: 20-cv-01712-LAB-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
v. SHOW CAUSE
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et
al., 15 Defendants. [ECF No. 7] 16 This matter is before the Court on an Order to Show Cause why contempt sanctions should not issue against Third Party Vantage Point Advisors, Inc. (“Vantage Point”) for its failure to timely comply with a subpoena duces tecum and an order of this Court. (ECF No. 7 at 8.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that compensatory contempt sanctions against Vantage Point are not appropriate at this time and discharges its Order to Show Cause. I. BACKGROUND On September 1, 2020, Plaintiff Marc S. Kirschner filed motion to enforce an out- of-district subpoena duces tecum served on Vantage Point on December 17, 2019, and compel Vantage Point to produce documents responsive to the subpoena. (ECF No. 1.) In his…