City of Imperial Beach v. The International Boundary & Water Commission - United States Section

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20213:18-cv-00457California897 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

24 On June 25, 2020, the Parties filed a Joint Motion to Stay requesting that the court 25 stay this action and the related actions “while the United States Environmental Protection 26 Agency [(“EPA”)] . . . identifies and moves towards the construction of transboundary 27 28 1 pollution control infrastructure in Tijuana River Valley.” (Doc. No. 122 at 3). The 2 Parties’ request was based on the enactment of the United States-Mexico-Canada 3 Implementation Act (“USMCA”) on January 29, 2020, “which appropriated to the EPA 4 $300 million for the construction of priority wastewater treatment works to address 5 transboundary pollution in the Tijuana River Valley, and other areas of the border.” Id. at 6 5. 7 At a June 2, 2020 meeting, the EPA announced it would launch a “roughly one-year 8 public process” to evaluate the technical, environmental, and financial feasibility of various 9 potential projects, the results of which would inform what projects would be constructed 10 in the Tijuana River Valley using USMCA funds. Id. at 5-6. According to the Parties, the 11 projects the EPA intended to study were “substantially similar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.