Cristo

Cristo v. The Charles Schwab Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20213:17-cv-01843California2,630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CONSTANTINE GUS CRISTO, Case No.: 17-cv-1843-GPC-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

v. PARTE MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

THE CHARLES SCHWAB

ORDER AND PRELIMINARY

CORPORATION; SCHWAB

INJUNCTION

HOLDINGS, INC.; CHARLES

SCHWAB & CO., INC.; CHARLES [Dkt. No. 40.] SCHWAB BANK; and CHARLES

SCHWAB INVESTMENT

MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants. 20 On June 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) enjoining the FINRA1 Panel in FINRA Case No. 19-02822 from convening a three-day evidentiary hearing via Zoom starting on June 28, 2021 and lasting three days until June 30, 2021. (Dkt. No. 40.) Schwab Defendants2 filed a response on June 23, 2021. (Dkt. No. 4.) A telephonic hearing was held on June 25, 2021. (Dkt. No. 46.) Plaintiff 26 1 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority 2 Schwab Defendants include…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.