Denson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VALERIE DENSON, Case No.: 3:20-cv-2228-L-BGS

Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER REQUIRING

13 KEPLR VISION, LLC, et al., SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON Defendants, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

COMPEL (DOC. NO. 20)

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. (Doc. No. 20). Plaintiff opposed, and Defendants replied. (Doc. Nos. 25 and 26). In the opposition, Plaintiff argues the arbitration agreement at issue (Doc. No. 20, Exhibit 1 at 1-5) is unconscionable. (Doc. No. 25 at 10). Plaintiff relies, in part, on her right to attorneys’ fees. (Id. at 11) (citing cases on fee-shifting). In response, Defendants cite a clause from the agreement that authorizes the arbitrator to award a prevailing party reasonable attorneys’ fees. (Doc. No. 26 at 9) (“the arbitrator may award the prevailing party his or her expenses and fees of arbitration, including reasonable attorney fees.”) The Court finds supplemental…