Moore

Moore v. State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20213:21-cv-01114California786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SURF MOORE, Case No.: 21-cv-1114 DMS (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

AND (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Defendant. WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH

RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) 19 Plaintiff Surf Moore, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a Complaint along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). A. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to

27 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.