Jackson v. Covello et.al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20213:19-cv-02444-JAH-MMPCalifornia622 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO JACKSON, CDCR #AK- Case No.: 19CV2444-JAH-MDD 4312,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff, TIME TO AMEND v.

P. COVELLO; J. JUAREZ; SERGEANT

ANDERSON; CORRECTIONAL

ORRICER MARTINEZE; A. CANEDO;

A. TAYLOR; GARCIA; R. FLORES,

17 Defendant.

19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Ricardo Jackson’s (“Plaintiff”) Response to this 20 Court’s Order to Show Cause requesting an additional days to file his amended 21 complaint. See ECF 41. Plaintiff, a prisoner currently incarcerated at the California 22 Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“CSATF”), proceeds pro se in this civil rights action 23 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 26, 2020, pursuant to the sua sponte review of 24 Plaintiff’s complaint required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A, this Court found 25 Plaintiff had sufficiently pled only his First Amendment retaliation claims against 26 Defendant Flores. See ECF 23. In that Order, Plaintiff was given the option to either notify 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.