Alcantara
Alcantara v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSEL A.1, Case No.: 20cv1098-MSB
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR
v. JUDICIAL REVIEW [ECF NO. 16] ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On June 17, 2020, Rosel A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income. (ECF No. 1; Certified Admin. R. (“AR”) 13-31, ECF No. 11.) Now pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review.2 (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court ORDERS that judgment be 24 25 1 Under Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), “[o]pinions by the court in [Social Security cases under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)] will refer to any non-government parties by using only their first name and last initial.” 2 Though the parties’ titled the instant motion a “Joint Stipulation”…