Coleman
Coleman v. United Services Automobile Association
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EILEEN-GAYLE COLEMAN and Case No.: 21-cv-217-CAB-LL ROBERT CASTRO, on behalf of 12 themselves and all others similarly ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND situated, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiffs,
v. [Doc. No. 17] UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and USAA GENERAL
INDEMNITY COMPANY,
18 Defendants.
21 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants United Services Automobile 22 Association and USAA General Indemnity Company’s (collectively, “Defendants”) 23 motion to dismiss. [Doc. No. 17.] The motion has been fully briefed and the Court finds 24 it suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See CivLR 25 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part 26 with leave to amend.
28 I. ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT A. Parties United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”) is a “reciprocal interinsurance exchange” and…