Brumbach

Brumbach v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20213:20-cv-02231California3,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 MICHAEL D. BRUMBACH, on Case No.: 20-cv-2231-WQH-KSC behalf of himself and all others 14 similarly situated, ORDER 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation doing business as Manchester Grand 19 Hyatt San Diego; and DOES 1- 100, inclusive, Defendants. HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Defendant Hyatt Corporation. (ECF No. 22). I. BACKGROUND a. Crump v. Hyatt Corp. On December 6, 2019, Christine Crump filed a wage and hour class action complaint against Hyatt Corporation (“Hyatt”) and Does 1 through 100 in the Alameda County Superior Court (the “Crump Action”). (See Afar Decl., ECF No. 22-1 ¶ 3). Hyatt removed the Crump Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, assigned case number 4:20-cv-00295-HSG. (Id.). On August 5, 2020, Crump filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”). (Ex. A to Afar Decl., ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.