Raiser

Raiser v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20213:19-cv-00751California1,386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 19-cv-0751-GPC-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SAN DIEGO COUNTY, et al.,

MOTION FOR RECUSAL; AND

Defendants. (2) SUA SPONTE GRANTING THE

FILING OF SUR-REPLY

17 [ECF Nos. 187, 190, 196]

INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Recusal, initially filed on May 21, 2021, and amended on May 24, 2021. ECF Nos. 187, 190. Defendants filed an Opposition, ECF No. 192, and Plaintiff filed a Reply afterwards,1 ECF Nos. 194, 197. Upon considering the moving documents and the case record, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s

25 1 Plaintiff moved to amend/correct the Reply brief, see ECF No. 196, which the Court accepts and thus considers the Amended Reply, ECF No. 197. 27 Motion for Recusal, but sua sponte GRANTS the filing of Plaintiff’s proposed Sur- Reply, ECF No. 173, so that the Sur-Reply is deemed filed and taken into consideration. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.