Young
Young v. Shoe Palace Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARAH YOUNG, Case No.: 21CV559-GPC(MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO STAY
SHOE PALACE CORPORATION, [Dkt. No. 3.] Defendant. 16 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay this case pending conclusion of Katt v. Shoe Palace Corporation, Case No. 1:19cv3676-RBJ, D. Colo (filed Dec. 26, 2019), a case pending in the District Court for the District of Colorado. (Dkt. No. 3.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendant replied1. (Dkt. Nos. 5, 6.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to stay proceedings. / / / 23 24 1 In its reply, Defendant argues for the first time that the Court should decline supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Civil Rights Act claim. (Dkt. No. 6 at 3-7.) “It is improper for a moving party to introduce new facts or different legal arguments in the reply brief than those presented in the moving papers.” United States…