Raiser

Raiser v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20213:19-cv-00751California11,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 19-cv-0751-GPC-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

DEFENDANTS

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 132, 133, 185, 186] 16 Before this Court are Motions for Summary Judgment, one collectively filed by the Defendants, and the other filed by Plaintiff, Mr. Aaron Raiser (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Raiser”) who is litigating pro se. ECF Nos. 132, 133. Upon consideration of the moving documents and the case record, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Mr. Raiser filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on July 9, 2019, which is the operative pleading in the instant matter. ECF No. 9. In general, the FAC alleged that Defendants—consisting of Defendant San Diego County and sheriff deputies of the 27 County who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.