Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20213:18-cv-00361California1,195 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

D. PARAMO, et al., (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT Defendants. PARAMO’S MOTION IN ITS

ENTIRETY; AND (3) GRANTING

IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT ZENDEJAS’S

MOTION

19 (ECF No. 234) 20

Presently before the Court is Defendants D. Paramo (“Defendant Paramo”) and E. Zendejas’s (“Defendant Zendejas”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 181), as well as Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed’s (“Plaintiff”) opposition thereto (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 190), Plaintiff’s “Additional Opposition Response[s]” (ECF Nos. 202, 204), and Defendant’s reply in support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 209). Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher has issued a Report 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.