Reed
Reed v. Paramo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20213:18-cv-00361California1,195 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (DEB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT
v. AND RECOMMENDATION ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
D. PARAMO, et al., (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT Defendants. PARAMO’S MOTION IN ITS
ENTIRETY; AND (3) GRANTING
IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT ZENDEJAS’S
MOTION
19 (ECF No. 234) 20
Presently before the Court is Defendants D. Paramo (“Defendant Paramo”) and E. Zendejas’s (“Defendant Zendejas”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 181), as well as Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed’s (“Plaintiff”) opposition thereto (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 190), Plaintiff’s “Additional Opposition Response[s]” (ECF Nos. 202, 204), and Defendant’s reply in support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 209). Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher has issued a Report 28 …