Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. v. Project Management Institute, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20213:18-cv-01927California1,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES Case No.: 18cv1927 JM (MSB)

RESEARCH, INC.,

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL

Plaintiff, 12 v.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE,

INC.,

15 Defendant.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE,

INC., Counter-Claimant, v. WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH, INC., et al., 21 Counter-Defendants.

23 Presently before the court is Plaintiff Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. (“WTRI”)’s (Doc. No. 125) and Defendant Project Management Institute, Inc. (“PMI”)’s (Doc. Nos. 130, 133, 141, 147, 159) Motions to Seal, filed in connection with the Parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 126 and 158) and Daubert Motions (Doc. 28 Nos. 128, 132, 134, 136, 137, 146). For the reasons set forth below, the Parties’ Motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.