Flynn

Flynn v. Love

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20213:21-cv-00629California3,585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL J. FLYNN and Case No.: 21-CV-629 JLS (KSC)

PHILLIP H. HARTMAN,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR v. JUDICIAL NOTICE AND 14 (2) STAYING ACTION PURSUANT

MICHAEL E. LOVE

TO THE FIRST-TO-FILE RULE and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

16 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 3, 4)

Presently before the Court are Defendant Michael E. Love’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Under the First-to-File Rule and Under Rule 12(b)(6) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 3) and supporting Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN,” ECF No. 4). Also before the Court is Plaintiffs Michael J. Flynn and Phillip H. Hartman’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 6) and Defendant’s Reply in support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 8) the Motion. The Court took these matters under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.