Gross

Gross v. GG Homes, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20213:21-cv-00271California6,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY GROSS, Case No. 3:21-cv-00271-DMS-BGS

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR

STRIKE

GG HOMES, INC.,

Defendant.

15 Pending before the Court is Defendant GG Homes, Inc.’s motion to dismiss and/or strike Plaintiff Kimberly Gross’ First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion, and Defendant filed a reply. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, and the motion to strike is denied. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History On February 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed her Complaint alleging various violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). (ECF No. 1.) Defendant filed a motion to dismiss and/or strike the Complaint on March 10, 2021. (ECF No. 3.) On March 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.