Williams v. Camden Old Creek

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20213:19-cv-00691California2,899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHALIECIA WILLIAMS, et al., Case No.: 3:19-cv-691-AJB-AHG Plaintiffs, ORDER RESOLVING JOINT

MOTION FOR DETERMINATION

v.

OF DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND

CAMDEN USA INC., et al., DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendants.

[ECF No. 47]

17 18

20 21

23 24

26 27 28 Before the Court is Plaintiff Shaliecia Williams (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Camden USA Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. ECF No. 47. Plaintiff seeks an order from the Court permitting Plaintiff’s deposition to proceed via videoconference, to which Defendant objects. Id. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion for protective order is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On March 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed the operative amended complaint in this matter, alleging negligence and violations of the Fair Housing Act, California Fair Employment and Housing Act, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.