Grady
Grady v. Alonzo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MITCHELL QUINTIN GRADY, Case No. 3:20cv1273-MMA-WVG
CDCR #AS-8775
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS vs. 13 MARIO ALONZO, et al., [Doc. No. 23] 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Mitchell Quintin Grady, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that five prison officials violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights. See Doc. No. 10 at 3–6; see also Doc. No. 13 at 7–8. All five Defendants—Alonzo, Dominguez, Urbina, Romero, and Veliz—move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Doc. No. 23 at 1–2. Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion, and Defendants replied. See Doc. Nos. 24, 25. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. 27 28 BACKGROUND This…