Rapinoe

Rapinoe v. San Diego County Sheriffs Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20213:21-cv-01162California4,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN JAMES RAPINOE, Case No.: 21cv1162-DMS (RBM)

BOOKING #20944775,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b) OFFICE, DOCTOR MONTGOMERY, DOCTOR RAFFI and DOCTOR ARCY, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Brian James Rapinoe, incarcerated at the Vista Detention Facility in Vista, California, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff claims he has been denied proper medical care because his knee injury was not properly evaluated, his inmate grievances were not properly handled, and the San Diego Sheriff’s Office has implemented a no-narcotics policy which prevents doctors from providing proper medical care where narcotic pain medication is required. (See id. at 2-5.) Plaintiff did not prepay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.