Papciak

Breaking Code Silence v. Papciak

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20213:21-cv-00918California862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BREAKING CODE SILENCE, Case No. 21-cv-00918-BAS-DEB 8 Plaintiff, ORDER: 9 v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANT JENNIFER WALKER’S REQUEST CHELSEA PAPCIAK, et al., TO STRIKE THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. (ECF No. 24); 12 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS TO ENTER DEFAULT (ECF Nos. 27–31); 14 (3) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT MARTHA THOMPSON’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 15) 16 Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on June 23, 2021. (ECF No. 19.) On July 9, 2021, Defendant Jennifer Walker objected to the filing of the SAC because she neither consented to the filing nor did Plaintiff seek leave of court. (Obj., ECF No. 24.) She states she provided only “conditional consent” to be “provided upon Plaintiff’s performance of subsequent conditions, to which Plaintiff did not agree.” (Id.) Plaintiff has responded …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.