Carr

Carr v. McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20213:21-cv-00900California2,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL D. CARR, Case No. 21cv900 MMA (MSB)

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS;

NEIL McDOWELL, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. [Doc. No. 5]

DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED PETITION

20 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Doc. No. 1. On May 19, 2021, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the petition without prejudice and with leave to amend for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement, as the trust account statement accompanying the request for IFP reflected an account balance sufficient to pay the $5.00 filing fee, and for failure to allege exhaustion of state court remedies as to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.