Carr
Carr v. McDowell
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20213:21-cv-00900California2,201 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL D. CARR, Case No. 21cv900 MMA (MSB)
Petitioner,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS;
NEIL McDOWELL, Warden, et al.,
Respondents. [Doc. No. 5]
DENYING REQUEST FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;
GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE FIRST AMENDED PETITION
20 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Doc. No. 1. On May 19, 2021, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the petition without prejudice and with leave to amend for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement, as the trust account statement accompanying the request for IFP reflected an account balance sufficient to pay the $5.00 filing fee, and for failure to allege exhaustion of state court remedies as to…