Peterson

Peterson v. Leahy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20213:21-cv-01116California1,367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY PETERSON, an individual, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01116-GPC-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

CHRISTOPHER LEAHY, BRETT

BURKETT, SAN DIEGO POLICE

DEPARTMENT, ZACHERY

BRADLEY, OFFICE OF CITY

ATTORNEY, EMILY GARSON,

17 JEFFREY JORDON in their individual capacities, Defendants. 20 On June 15, 2021, Plaintiff Jeffrey Peterson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the instant action against Defendants Christopher Leahy, Brett Burkett, San Diego Police Department, Zachery Bradley, Office of City Attorney, Emily Garson, and Jeffrey Jordon. Compl. 1, ECF No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff concurrently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. 26 27 The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.