Potts

Potts v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20213:21-cv-00256California3,092 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FILED

JUL on CLERK US. DISTRIGTCOURT □

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BY ff> DEPUTY 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || RACHEL POTTS, an individual; Case No.: 3:21-cv-00256-BEN-BGS JAMIKO REI BELL, an individual

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS Vv. [ECF No. 24] || FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; CARMAX || AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 18 || 10, Defendants. 20 Plaintiffs Rachel Potts and Jamiko Rei Bell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are suing 21 Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC 22 (“CarMax”, and when referred to collectively with Ford, “Defendants”), and ten unnamed 23 defendants for state law violations. The Court previously granted Defendants’ Motions 24 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.