Polus

Polus v. Sharp Healthcare

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20213:20-cv-02253California1,770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAWAHER POLUS, Case No.: 20-CV-2253 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) VACATING AUGUST 5,

v. 2021 HEARING, (2) REJECTING

LATE-FILED OPPOSITION TO

SHARP HEALTHCARE; UNITED

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

STATES OF AMERICA; and DOES PLEADINGS, AND (3) GRANTING 1 through 50,

UNOPPOSED MOTION

16 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 13, 18)

Presently before the Court is Defendant Sharp Healthcare’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Mot.,” ECF No. 13). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), Plaintiff Jawaher Polus’s opposition to the Motion was due on or before July 22, 2021. See S.D. CivLR 7.1(e)(2). On July 28, 2021, Defendant filed a Notice of Plaintiff’s Non-Opposition to Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 17), which apparently prompted Plaintiff to file an untimely Opposition to Defendant’s Motion the following day (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 18). Defendant has since filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.