Reed

Reed v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20213:20-cv-02439California1,641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 3:20-cv-2439-AJB-MDD

CDCR #AE-9821,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, DISMISS COMPLAINT AND vs. EXPUNGE FILING FEE 14 [ECF No. 16]

GAVIN NEWSOM, SAL URIBE,

ALONDRA RUIZ, PAULETTE

NANDER, M.D., et al., Defendants. 18 On November 11, 2020, Mychal Andra Reed (“Plaintiff”), incarcerated at R.J. Donavan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff also filed two Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) along with a copy of his prison trust account statement. (See ECF Nos. 3 & 5.) On December 10, 2020, the District Court for the Northern District of California concluded venue was more appropriate in the Southern District of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.