Booth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMMY MAE BOOTH, Case No. 21-cv-00469-BAS-RBB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO SHOW

CAUSE

GONZALO P. CURIEL, et al.,

Defendants. 16 The Court incorporates the background section from the Court’s Order to Show Cause (“OSC”). (ECF No. 6 at 1:23–2:16.) In a nutshell, Plaintiff Tammy Mae Booth filed this action against Defendants Mark D. Feinberg, Jean M. Heinz, Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law (“H&F Defendants”), and Judge Curiel. (ECF No. 1.) Booth argues Judge Curiel erred by striking a default that had been entered in her favor in the related miscellaneous action, Booth v. Kane et al., 3:20-mc-00981, and dismissing her Complaint in the converted civil action, Booth v. Kane et al., 3:20-cv-02543-GPC-KSC. Booth argues that Judge Curiel is in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, Foreign Agents Registration Act, and a swath of criminal statutes. …