Cavalier

Cavalier v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20213:20-cv-01615California685 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT THOMAS CAVALIER, Case No. 20cv1615-MMA-DEB

CDCR #E-98747,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT vs. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND 14 § 1915A(b)(1) AND FOR FAILING GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE Defendants. WITH COURT ORDERS

REQUIRING AMENDMENT

17 Plaintiff Robert Thomas Cavalier, incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his Complaint, Plaintiff claimed the Governor of California, a former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the Director of the Board of Parole Hearings (“BPH”), and BPH Commissioner Randy Grounds violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights during a September 6, 2019 parole suitability hearing. See “Compl.,” Doc. No. 1 at 1‒6. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.