Sebastian
Sebastian v. One Brands, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BRITTANY SEBASTIAN, Case No.: 3:20-cv-9-L-MDD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE
ONE BRANDS LLC, TO AMEND (ECF 58)
Defendant. 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF 58). There is no opposition. (See Docket). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), courts “should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). “This policy is to be applied with extreme liberality.” Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir. 2003). In general, when ruling on a motion to amend, courts consider: undue delay, the movant’s bad faith, prejudice to the opposing party, whether the movant previously amended their complaint, and futility of amendment. Foman v. Davis,…