Amaraut

Amaraut v. Sprint/United Management Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20213:19-cv-00411California6,719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADIMIR AMARAUT, Case No.: 19-cv-411-WQH-AHG

KATHERINE ALMONTE,

KRISTOPHER FOX, DYLAN ORDER MCCOLLUM, QUINN MYERS, and MARISSA PAINTER, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 SPRINT/UNITED

MANAGEMENT COMPANY,

19 Defendant. 20 HAYES, Judge: 21 The matters before the Court are the Motion for Final Approval of Class and 22 Collective Action Settlement (ECF No. 201) and the Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees 23 and Costs, Service Awards, and Approval of Cy Pres Recipient (ECF No. 202) filed by 24 Plaintiffs Vladimir Amaraut, Katherine Almonte, Kristopher Fox, Dylan McCollum, 25 Quinn Myers, and Marissa Painter. 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2019, Plaintiff Vladimir Amaraut filed a Collective and Class Action Complaint against Defendant Sprint/United Management Company (“Sprint”), alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and California wage and hour laws. (ECF No. 1). On November 1, 2019, Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.