Castro

Castro v. Santwier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20213:21-cv-00853California1,885 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN MANUEL CASTRO, Case No. 21-CV-853 JLS (LL)

CDCR #J-76819,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

RICKARD SANTWIER,

(ECF No. 3) Defendant. 16 17 On April 26, 2020, Plaintiff Juan Manuel Castro, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). The only named Defendant is an attorney, Rickard Santwier, who allegedly practices law in Pasadena, California, and the only allegations in the Complaint consist of rambling, incoherent details of Plaintiff’s life. See id. at 3–5, 8–17. On June 2, 2021, the Court dismissed this action because Plaintiff had failed to: (1) pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”); (2) present sufficient facts in the Complaint to determine whether venue is proper in the 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.