In Re In the matter of the Complaint of Harry Funk and Laura Glaves-Funk

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20213:21-cv-01046California1,529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE: THE COMPLAINT OF FUNK Case No. 21-cv-1046-MMA (RBB)

AND GLAVES-FUNK FOR

EXONERATION FROM, OR ORDER GRANTING CLAIMANT

LIMITATION OF, LIABILITY, GEICO MARINE INSURANCE

COMPANY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE LATE ANSWER AND

CLAIM

16 [Doc. No. 19] 17 18 Claimant Geico Marine Insurance Company (“Geico”) moves “for Leave to File its Answer and Counterclaim out of time” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b). See Doc. No. 19 at 1–2. Plaintiffs-in-Limitation Harry Funk and Laura Glaves-Funk (collectively, “Plaintiffs-in-Limitation”) have not filed an opposition brief or notice of non-opposition, see CivLR 7.1.e.2, 7.1.f.3, but Geico represents that Plaintiffs-in- Limitation do not oppose the motion, see Noma Decl., Doc. No. 19 ¶ 7. The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to

27 1 All citations to electronically filed documents refer to the pagination assigned by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.