In Re In the matter of the Complaint of Harry Funk and Laura Glaves-Funk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE: THE COMPLAINT OF FUNK Case No. 21-cv-1046-MMA (RBB)
AND GLAVES-FUNK FOR
EXONERATION FROM, OR ORDER GRANTING CLAIMANT
LIMITATION OF, LIABILITY, GEICO MARINE INSURANCE
COMPANY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE LATE ANSWER AND
CLAIM
16 [Doc. No. 19] 17 18 Claimant Geico Marine Insurance Company (“Geico”) moves “for Leave to File its Answer and Counterclaim out of time” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b). See Doc. No. 19 at 1–2. Plaintiffs-in-Limitation Harry Funk and Laura Glaves-Funk (collectively, “Plaintiffs-in-Limitation”) have not filed an opposition brief or notice of non-opposition, see CivLR 7.1.e.2, 7.1.f.3, but Geico represents that Plaintiffs-in- Limitation do not oppose the motion, see Noma Decl., Doc. No. 19 ¶ 7. The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to
27 1 All citations to electronically filed documents refer to the pagination assigned by…