Ewing

Ewing v. BF Advance, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20213:20-cv-01748California4,899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ANTON EWING, Case No. 20-cv-1748-BAS-WVG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v. (ECF No. 24) BF ADVANCE, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company; JOSEPH COHN, an individual, Defendants. 13 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion and Defendants filed a Reply on April 28, 2021. (ECF Nos. 28, 32.) The Court finds the Motion to Dismiss suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); CivLR 7.1(d)(1). Upon review of the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. I. BACKGROUND In the operative First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleges Defendants BF Advance (“BFA”) and BFA manager Joseph Cohen violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.