Upton

Upton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20213:20-cv-00325California3,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STUART T. UPTON, Case No.: 20-CV-325 JLS (NLS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S Commissioner, Social Security CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY Administration,

JUDGMENT, AND (3) REMANDING

16 Defendant. MATTER FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

18 (ECF Nos. 17, 18)

On March 20, 2020, Plaintiff Stuart J. Upton (“Plaintiff”) filed an Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.,” ECF No. 8) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which seeks judicial review of a decision by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant” or the “Commissioner”), who denied Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 17),1 and in response, Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.