Weeces

Weeces v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20213:20-cv-01439California3,569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK W., Case No.: 20cv1439-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MERITS BRIEF [Doc. No. 14] AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Social Security, JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 17] Defendant.

17 On July 27, 2020, plaintiff Frank W. commenced an action pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g), against Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner. [Doc. No. 1.] Currently before the Court are plaintiff’s Merits Brief seeking a reversal with an award of benefits or a remand for further proceedings [Doc. No. 14] and defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment seeking an order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of benefits [Doc. No. 17]. For the reasons outlined more fully below, the Court finds that plaintiff’s Merits Brief must be DENIED [Doc. No. 14], and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.