Woods

Woods v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20213:21-cv-00111California3,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARYL K. WOODS, Case No.: 21-CV-111-MMA(WVG)

Petitioner,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMMENDATION ON

RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

POLLARD, Warden,

DISMISS

Respondent. [Doc. No. 7.] 16 17 Petitioner Daryl Woods, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254. He alleges that his federal constitutional rights were violated and his freedom is being withheld without cause. (Doc. No. 1 at 5.) Petitioner alleges that California Petition 57 and California Assembly Bill 965 allow for his early release. (Id.) Further, he notes that he is denied “qualified liberty” and therefore his Fourteenth Amendment rights are violated. (Id.) Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss, and the petitioner subsequently filed an opposition.1 The Court has reviewed the

26 1 The opposition filed by Petitioner has been docketed as a “traverse” in the electronic court 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.