Bynum

Bynum v. Everett

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20213:21-cv-00921California2,913 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER BYNUM, Case No.: 21-cv-0921-GPC-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR JAMES EVERETT, individual capacity;

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

and SAN DIEGO MESA COLLEGE, PAUPERIS; AND Defendants. 16 (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

[ECF Nos. 1, 3] On May 14, 2021, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s action arises from the allegation that “an officer pull[ed] his weapon on the Plaintiff because he was unfamiliar with what a ‘go-pro’ video camera is.” (Id. at 4.) Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP but sua sponte DISMISSES without prejudice the entire action for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.