Jergens, Inc. v. 5th Axis, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20213:20-cv-02377California2,931 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 20-cv-2377-CAB(BLM) JERGENS, INC.,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 5TH

AXIS, INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL

v. [ECF No. 43] 5TH AXIS, INC., CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR,

STEPHEN GRANGETTO, and ADAM LANE, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On June 4, 2021, Defendant 5th Axis, Inc. (“5th Axis”) filed a motion to compel further responses to its Request for Production of Documents No. 57 and Interrogatory No. 4 and for monetary sanctions. [ECF No. 43 (“MTC”)]. On June 11, 2021, Plaintiff Jergens, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Jergens”) filed its opposition to 5th Axis’ motion. [ECF No. 45 (“Oppo”)]. On June 21, 2021, 5th Axis filed a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. [ECF No. 50 (“Reply”)]. On June 23, 2021, with the Court’s permission, Plaintiff filed a sur-reply. [ECF No. 51 (“Sur-reply”)]. This discovery dispute focuses on a letter that Plaintiff received from its outside legal counsel and then provided to Defendants Christopher Taylor, Stephen Grangetto, and 5th Axis in August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.