McAllister
McAllister v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY McALLISTER, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01490-MMA-AHG Plaintiff, In Admiralty v. ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO AMEND
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
SCHEDULING ORDER
PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS, LLC, and 15 DOES 1-10, inclusive, in personam; and [ECF No. 89] M/V MARJORIE C, her engines, apparel, electronics, tackle, boats, appurtenances, 17 etc. in rem, 18 Defendants.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Third-Party Plaintiff, 21 v. 23 M/V MARJORIE C, her engines, apparel, electronics, tackle, boats, appurtenances, etc., in rem, 25 Third-Party Defendant.
AND RELATED ACTIONS 28 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ fourth Joint Motion for Amended Scheduling Order. ECF No. 89. Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon…