Grizzle

Grizzle v. San Diego, County of

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20213:17-cv-00813California4,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

□ □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. . □

11 || ELLIOT SCOTT GRIZZLE, _ Case No.: 17-cv-00813-JLS-RBM Paint! ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

|| COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., RESPONSES ro WRITLEN THER _ Defendants.| DISCOVERY [Doe. 137] 17 I. INTRODUCTION On September 27, 2019, Plaintiff Elliot Scott Grizzle (“Plaintiff”), through his |lcounsel, filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). (Doc. 110.) Plaintiff asserts claims against the County of San Diego (“County”), Sheriff William Gore (“Sheriff Gore”), Lieutenant Lena Lovelace ||(“Lieutenant Lovelace”), and Aaron Boorman (“Sergeant Boorman”) (collectively ||“Defendants”).! (Id) On April 14, 2021, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel (“MTC”) further responses written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.