Roettgen

Roettgen v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20213:21-cv-01285California3,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN ROETTGEN, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01285-CAB-BLM

CDCR #V-05142,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2] DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, et al., 16 Defendants. AND 17 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

AND SUMMONS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND 20 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 21 Plaintiff John Roettgen, currently incarcerated at California State Prison- Sacramento (“CSP-SAC”), and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Roettgen claims various prison officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights while he was incarcerated there in July through September 2017. Id. at 1, 13‒24. He seeks $500,000 in compensatory and punitive damages. Id. at 24-25. Roettgen did not prepay the civil filing fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.