D.C.
D.C. v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D.C., a minor by and through his Case No. 15-cv-1868-MMA (NLS) Guardian Ad Litem, HELEN GARTER,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
Plaintiff, TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER v. SEAL
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [Doc. No. 142] Defendant. 16 17 18 D.C. by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Helen Garter, (“Plaintiff”) moves to seal Exhibits 9–22 in support of his motion for partial summary judgement. See Doc. No. 142. The Court has reviewed the motion and documents. For the following reasons, the Court determines that supplemental briefing is warranted. When presented with a request to file a document under seal, the Court begins with the strong presumption in favor of the “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978) (footnote omitted); see also Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu,…