Cleveland v. The Behemoth
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 19-cv-0672-GPC-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER OVERRULING IN PART
v. AND SUSTAINING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO
THE BEHEMOTH, a California
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MAY 27,
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 2021 ORDER Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 44.] 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s May 27, 2021 discovery order. (“MJ Order” or “the challenged Order,” ECF No. 42). Pl. Mot., ECF No. 44. On June 25, 2021, Defendant opposed. ECF No. 46. On July 02, 2021, Plaintiff replied. ECF No. 47. Based on the reasoning below, the Court OVERRULES in part and SUSTAINS in part Plaintiff’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s discovery order. In light of this ruling, the Court VACATES the hearing set for this matter on August 27, 2021. \ \ \ \ \ \ 27 I. BACKGROUND The underlying suit concerns allegations of a hostile work…