Garcia

Garcia v. Apple Seven Services San Diego, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20213:20-cv-02385California2,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 20-cv-02385-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v.

(1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ APPLE SEVEN SERVICES SAN MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 3); DIEGO, INC., et al., AND Defendants. 16 (2) DEFERRING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO AMEND THE

PLEADING.

18 19 Plaintiff Orlando Garcia (“Plaintiff”) filed this Complaint containing two counts for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Act. Defendants Apple Seven Services San Diego, Inc. and Apple Seven Services SPE San Diego, Inc. (“Defendants”) have moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has responded (Opp’n, ECF No. 4) and Defendants have replied (ECF No. 5). The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.