Neville

Neville v. Dill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20213:21-cv-01148California1,666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT NEVILLE, MD, Case No.: 21cv1148-CAB-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [Doc. No. 5] MARGUERITE DILL, Defendant.

17 On July 14, 2021, Defendant Marguerite Dill filed a motion for judgment on the 18 pleadings under FRCP 12(c), or alternatively, to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6). [Doc. No. 19 5.] To date, no opposition has been filed. On August 11, 2021, Defendant filed a reply, 20 noting that Plaintiff Robert Neville, M.D. had failed to timely oppose the motion. [Doc. 21 No. 6.] For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED. 22 Procedural Background 23 On January 3, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of 24 Georgia permanently enjoined Plaintiff “from, either directly or indirectly, litigating the 25 administration of Jessica Neville’s estate or the Bulloch Property transaction any further 26 in this Court.” Neville v. McCaghren (“McCaphren Action”), Case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.