Rosenthal
Rosenthal v. Newsome
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TROY ALLAN ROSENTHAL, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1356-MMA-BLM Booking No. 20937565,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; vs. 14 [Doc. No. 2]
GAVIN NEWSOME; SUMMER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
STEPHAN; STEVE CASE; PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
CHRIS EDENS, § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) Defendants. 19 20 Troy Allan Rosenthal (“Plaintiff”), housed at the Vista Detention Facility (“VDF”) in San Diego, California, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges violations of his constitutional rights occurred when he was previously housed at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“CSATF”). See id. at 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing, and instead filed three Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis…