Hall
Hall v. Marriott International Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 In re: Case No.: 3:21-cv-1370-JLS-AHG SUBPOENA ON THIRD-PARTY ORDER DENYING
JULIE DRASSINOWER JULIE DRASSINOWER’S
MOTION TO QUASH
DEPOSITION SUBPOENA
16 [ECF No. 1] 17 ___________________________________ 18 TODD HALL, KEVIN BRANCA, and Underlying action pending in the GEORGE ABDELSAYED, individually Southern District of California: and on behalf of all others similarly 20 situated, Case No. 3:19-cv-1715-JLS-AHG Plaintiffs, v.
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant. 25 Before the Court is Julie Drassinower’s Motion to Quash. ECF No. 1. Pursuant to 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(3), Ms. Drassinower asks the Court to quash the 27 deposition subpoena served on her by Defendant Marriott International, Inc. (“Defendant”) 28 in a case currently pending in this District. Id. Defendant opposes the motion. ECF No. 3. 2 …