Hall

Hall v. Marriott International Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20213:21-cv-01370California6,192 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 In re: Case No.: 3:21-cv-1370-JLS-AHG SUBPOENA ON THIRD-PARTY ORDER DENYING

JULIE DRASSINOWER JULIE DRASSINOWER’S

MOTION TO QUASH

DEPOSITION SUBPOENA

16 [ECF No. 1] 17 ___________________________________ 18 TODD HALL, KEVIN BRANCA, and Underlying action pending in the GEORGE ABDELSAYED, individually Southern District of California: and on behalf of all others similarly 20 situated, Case No. 3:19-cv-1715-JLS-AHG Plaintiffs, v.

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant. 25 Before the Court is Julie Drassinower’s Motion to Quash. ECF No. 1. Pursuant to 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(3), Ms. Drassinower asks the Court to quash the 27 deposition subpoena served on her by Defendant Marriott International, Inc. (“Defendant”) 28 in a case currently pending in this District. Id. Defendant opposes the motion. ECF No. 3. 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.