Carr

Carr v. McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20213:21-cv-00900California1,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL D. CARR, Case No. 21-cv-900-MMA (MSB)

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING SECOND

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

FIRST AMENDED PETITION

NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, and ROB

BONTA, Attorney General, [Doc. No. 10] Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Doc. No. 1. The Court previously instructed Petitioner that in order to reopen and proceed with this case, Petitioner was required to submit a First Amended Petition that cures the pleading deficiencies outlined in the Court’s May 19, 2021 Order together with the required filing fee on or before July 19, 2021, and if Petitioner failed to satisfy the exhaustion requirement as to any claim presented in the action or request a stay of the instant habeas action while he exhausted his unexhausted claims, he would need to file a new petition which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.