Booth
Booth v. Feinberg
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMMY MAE BOOTH, Case No. 21-cv-01216-BAS-WVG
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING THE
v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS
BY DEFENDANTS MARK D.
JEAN M. HEINZ, et al.,
FEINBERG, JEAN M. HEINZ,
Defendants. HEINZ & FEINBERG ATTORNEYS AT LAW (ECF No. 3)
17 18 19 20 21 22 For the third time, Plaintiff Tammy Mae Both brings an action seeking monetary damages from Defendants Mark D. Feinberg, Jean M. Heinz, Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law. (ECF No. 1.) Her two previous actions were dismissed without prejudice, each time because of her noncompliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule. (Order, Booth v. Kane et al., 3:20-cv-02543-GPC-KSC, ECF No. 8; Order, Booth v. Feinberg et al., 3:21-cv-01216-BAS-WVG, ECF No. 5.) On July 6, 2021, Booth filed the present action against Defendants, raising copyright infringement claims that are substantially identical to the ones raised before. On…